My saying that killing is bad art is NOT saying that I have a clear definition of "good" and "bad". Instead, it is indicating that I have a clear RESPONSE to what I consider "good" and "bad" art.
Do YOU consider killing and war GOOD art?
Surely, you have personal responses to what is "good" and "bad", no?
If not, then how do you make judgements to do anything in a tangible, physical world?
I'm looking to compare resonance of feelings here, NOT written-in-stone definitions.
Definitions, as a starting place of communication, generally suck.
How do YOU use the words, "good" and "bad".
Tell me something you feel is good.
Then tell me something you feel is bad.
Then tell me something you feel is GOOD ART.
Then tell me something you feel is BAD ART.
And Tony,... you still condemn a valid interactive process here. Stop being a snob and join the frey.
Yours truly (and by that, I do not mean that I have a clear definition of "truth"),
RK
Buy FLUIDISM 2011 Wall Calendars
Visit FLUIDISM Concepts Press Room
|
|
