I will celebrate with a glass of wine. You may also spare me the tedious explanation of statistics. I took biology, pshychology(yes, I know what 2 standard deviations away from the mean) MEANS,biochemistry,genetics, physics and majored in Analytical Chemistry and Fine Arts. The point I was trying to make was, I never told you how many games of chess I played nor did I give you the ratio of wins to losses, therefore, it would be impossible for you to rationally rate me on the information I gave you. But, since it obviously peaked your interest, I played chess for many years and read many books on the subject. I did not see any statistics for the ability to be able to play three dimensional chess. Three Dimentional chess is a game where you have 3 boards, thus, you may split your moves on 1,2,or 3 layers.Yes, just like the one in Star Trek. Since, I only played one person on a 3-d board and won every game I played that person...statistically I rate very high in that aspect of chess.However, since I have never met any one else who played 3-d chess, nor have I even seen the game any where else, my statistics are biased on 3-d chess because I have not played enough people(enough points to make a bell shaped curve) to base any meaningful statistcal data on that aspect of the game. So, let's just put the *@#* away, I was merely making conversation and nothing more.No offence.
Sincerely,
sgalli
|
|
